Senate committee examines wildfire prevention act and shipping fuel alternatives

Shelley Moore Capito, Chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee - Official U.S. Senate headshot
Shelley Moore Capito, Chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee - Official U.S. Senate headshot
0Comments

U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, led a hearing in Washington, D.C., to discuss the Wildfire Emissions Prevention Act (WEPA) and S. 881, the Renewable Fuel for Ocean-Going Vessels Act.

During the session, Chairman Capito focused on how states use prescribed burns as a forest management tool and raised questions about current regulations that affect their implementation. She asked witnesses about the role of prescribed burns in reducing large-scale wildfires and their impact on air quality.

“If I look at it from a practical matter, what I’m hearing are prescribed burns are smaller, more contained, to prevent a larger, uncontained [fire] which would have more pollution associated with it. So, from a practical standpoint, what you’re trying to prevent are the larger fires that are more damaging to our atmosphere and particulate matter and all that. I mean, that’s the crux of the argument that we’re having, am I correct?” Capito said.

Jonathan Wood, Vice President of Law & Policy at Property and Environment Research Center, responded: “That is exactly right. Prescribed fires are lower intensity, and you control when they happen, so the smoke is less destructive. I describe in my oral testimony that this weekend, you couldn’t see the mountains from Bozeman because wildlife smoke, that doesn’t happen from prescribed fire.”

The discussion also addressed challenges with the Environmental Protection Agency’s process for classifying certain events as “exceptional,” which can affect how states report air quality impacts from prescribed burns.

“So, when you say the exceptional events prescription that you can use through EPA, nobody’s using it. it sounds like very few uses of that?” Capito asked.

Wood replied: “They’re trying, my colleague can speak to that, it’s just not working.”

Capito continued: “So why is it not working? Is it just pent up in regulation? Or [WEPA] would clarify those?”

Johnny Sabo of Georgia Forestry Commission testified on behalf of state foresters: “[WEPA] would help bring clarity. So, Georgia, in February of 2025, submitted 129 exceptional events, 89 of those were prescribed fire. That was from 2021 to 2023, so that took that long to quantify everything, and we have still not heard back from EPA. We’re ready to submit another 20 for 2024, you know. But as these stacked up, if they’re denied, if somehow this gets viewed to where prescribed fire is not an exceptional event then we start seeing nonattainment areas potentially and we lose the ability to prescribe fire. And then states like Georgia then become states that are not utilizing prescribed fire and have catastrophic wildfire risk.”

Chairman Capito also questioned panelists about future options for alternative fuels in maritime shipping.

“In terms of the options it sounds like the [maritime] industry is very active in trying to find alternatives or at least additives in certain areas to be able to bring down the carbon footprint [of maritime shipping]. Where do you see this going and will it eventually get to a full out…non-carbon intensive industry or will it be a blend in your mind?” she asked.

Kathy Metcalf of Chamber of Shipping of America answered: “First of all ammonia hydrogen; my colleague ICCT went through a number of them methanol; a slightly politically hot one nuclear There are some small nuclear reactors that people are looking at as potential energy sources for port operations No I don’t think it’s going to be a mix The ultimate goal is to go to zero emissions by 2050 that is the IMO goal Now whether we get there or not we can have that discussion…but that is the goal and there will be no room for high polluting or high GHG emitting vessels as we move through time The only point I wanted to make also is that we need to look at decarbonization of any source but especially maritime transportation It’s not a light switch it’s a transition and it takes time to get there in a wise and economical way.”

The hearing highlighted ongoing efforts by lawmakers and industry representatives to address wildfire risks through legislative changes while supporting transitions toward cleaner energy sources within major transportation sectors.



Related

Senator Shelley Moore Capito, U.S. Senator for West Virginia - Official U.S. Senate headshot

Shelley Moore Capito criticizes Senate Democrats over impacts of government shutdown

Senator Shelley Moore Capito posted a series of tweets on November 5 and 6 criticizing Senate Democrats for a government shutdown she says caused flight delays and threatened public benefits.

Rep. Carol Miller, U.S. Representative for West Virginia 1st District - Official U.S. House headshot

Miller joins lawmakers proposing end of Cold War-era trade restrictions for Central Asia

Representatives Carol Miller (R-WV) and Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), alongside Senators Steve Daines (R-MT), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Jim Risch (R-ID), and Chris Murphy (D-CT), have introduced new bipartisan legislation aimed at eliminating the…

Senator Shelley Moore Capito, U.S. Senator for West Virginia - Official U.S. Senate headshot

Shelley Moore Capito comments on tech education initiative and government shutdown

Senator Shelley Moore Capito highlighted her involvement with a new digital literacy program for youth and voiced criticism of Senate Democrats regarding an ongoing government shutdown in posts dated November 4-5, 2025.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Charleston Leader.